Review outlines catalyst design methods for CO and CO2 hydrogenation, highlighting strategies for improved selectivity.
The catalytic hydrogenation of CO and CO 2 is fundamental yet practically important in C1 chemistry, leading to sustainable production of fuels and chemicals. A universal challenge across these transformations is precise control over complex reaction networks to achieve high activity and product selectivity. This review focuses on rational catalyst design guided by microenvironment engineering for two representative reactions with complex network, being hydroformylation and CO 2 hydrogenation. We first clarify the distinct chemical nature of CO and CO 2 that dominants divergent catalytic requirements. Then the concept and hierarchical regulation strategies of the catalytic microenvironment is systematically introduced, covering atomic/molecular coordination, nano/micro confinement, and mesoscale interfacial chemistry. For each reaction system, the reaction fundamentals, mechanistic insights, state-of-the-art heterogeneous catalysts, and key structure-performance relationships are summarized. Particular emphasis is placed on how microenvironment modulation, including coordination tuning, spatial confinement, mass transport, and interfacial interactions can determine C-O bond activation, hydrogenation steps, and intermediate stabilization. We further compare catalyst design principles between hydroformylation and CO 2 hydrogenation and highlight the unifying concept of matching C-O activation and hydrogenation capabilities for targeted product distribution. Finally, current limitations and propose future directions is outlined, including in situ characterization, dynamic microenvironment control, single-atom and bimetallic design, zeolite-based confinement, and machine-learning-assisted catalyst development. This review aims to provide a unified mechanistic and strategic framework for advancing selective CO/CO 2 hydrogenation catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: