Preliminary prospective study evaluates outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery for complex renal stones, suggesting expanded capabilities for urologists.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for treating complex renal stones, but only a minority of urologists in the United States independently obtain percutaneous access. The MONARCH™ Platform, Urology, is an FDA-cleared robotic platform that may simplify percutaneous access and efficiently treat complex renal stones. In this study, we evaluate the clinical, procedural, and patient-reported outcomes using this technology. METHODS: In a preliminary prospective study in two institutions (University of Wisconsin and Indiana University), patients were enrolled to undergo robotic-assisted mini-PCNL with combined ureteroscopic lithotripsy and followed up to 90 days post-procedure. Percutaneous access was gained using electromagnetic guidance while the patient was in a modified supine position. Stones were removed using a handheld controller to manipulate multiple instruments (i.e., retrograde ureteroscope, laser fiber, basket, flexible antegrade suction catheter) and control a fluid management system. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with median (range) linear stone burden of 32.6 (15.0-72.8) mm were enrolled. In 100% of cases, percutaneous access was successfully gained using this technology, and in 73.3% of cases this was achieved within a single attempt. Within this limited and highly heterogeneous study population, we achieved a postoperative day 30 median (range) volume reduction in stone burden of 98.8 (51.9-100.0)% and a stone-free rate (≤4 mm) of 50.0%. One perioperative Grade 3 complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience suggests a future where the MONARCH™ Platform may provide urologists with expanded capabilities for safe and effective treatment of select patients with nephrolithiasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knoedler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: