Assesses how democratic backsliding influences trade volume and partner dynamics, indicating significant trends with autocracies.
This paper aims to assess the effect of democratic backsliding on a country’s trade volume. I argue that as a country backslides their overall trade volume will decrease, trade with democracies will decrease, and trade with autocracies will increase. My second argument is that as a country becomes more central, the effects of backsliding will be reduced. This paper finds that overall trade increases for backsliders, when centrality is unaccounted for. Once centrality is introduced as a moderating effect these results are reaffirmed, but I find that backsliding affects a country’s long-standing trade partners more than its total trade volume. Additionally, there is no significant change in trade with democracies. In contrast, trade with autocracies shows a large statistically significant positive effect, which suggests more central backsliders increase their trade with autocracies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skye Law (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: