Bibliometric analysis maps evolving trends in GIS for crisis management, indicating a need for equitable data governance.
Escalating global disasters demand a strategic transition from static mapping to dynamic intelligence in crisis management. This bibliometric analysis maps the evolutionary trajectory of GIS in disaster research, using a dataset of 3,061 publications from the Web of Science (1993–2025). The findings reveal a profound epistemic transition: the field has evolved from an initial phase of “Reactive Baselining” (1993–2010) to the current era of “Disaster Intelligence” (2019–2025), driven by the integration of AI, deep learning, and real-time spatiotemporal analytics. However, the analysis also uncovers a polarized knowledge landscape where innovation is heavily concentrated in China, the United States, and Western Europe, revealing a significant “digital divide” that restricts the transferability of advanced geospatial tools to under-resourced regions in the Global South. Furthermore, the operationalization of technologies such as digital twins is hindered by interoperability and ethical data governance challenges. Policy implications are critical; to bridge the gap between algorithmic potential and on-the-ground reality, stakeholders must prioritize equitable capacity building, standardize cross-border data protocols, and establish rigorous privacy frameworks. This study provides a strategic roadmap for leveraging next-generation geospatial solutions to foster adaptive, resilient, and ethically governed global disaster management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: