Assesses owner traits impacting non-conventional diets in cats, suggesting implications for veterinary advice.
ObjectivesThe objectives were to assess the association between owner personality traits and the owner-reported use of non-conventional diets in domestic cats (starch-free, meat-only, grain-free, raw, or vegetarian), and to compare personality traits between owners reporting the incorporation of fresh meat-based foods and those relying exclusively on commercial diets.MethodsAn anonymous nationwide online survey of French cat owners was conducted (n = 1,566). The owner's personality was assessed using the French version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr). Two outcomes were defined: (1) use of a non-conventional diet (yes: n = 439) and (2) inclusion of fresh meat-based foods in the diet (i.e., not exclusively commercial with fresh meat; yes: n = 61). Two multivariable logistic regression models were built, with owner personality traits as explanatory variables. Model 1 evaluated the likelihood of using a non-conventional diet, while Model 2 assessed the likelihood of incorporating fresh meat in the diet.ResultsHigher openness to experience (OR 1.19 [1.01-1.41]). and lower conscientiousness (OR 0.80 [0.67-0.95]), associated with non-conventional feeding. Daily cooking (OR 1.49 [1.17-1.91]) and access to autonomous enrichment devices (OR 1.74 [1.11-2.84]) were also positively associated with non-conventional feeding.Lower Agreeableness was associated with higher odds of including fresh meat in the diet (OR 0.55 [0.35-0.87]). Training activities with the cat (OR 2.40 [1.32-4.18]) and owning a purebred cat (OR 2.10 [1.10-3.82]) were also positively associated with fresh meat feeding.Conclusions and relevanceThese results suggest that owners who choose non-conventional diets may present different personality traits. Recognizing these differences may help veterinarians adapt their communication and facilitate dialogue regarding feeding decisions in the interest of feline health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoummady et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: