Demonstrates bimodal rumor spreading dynamics in social networks, suggesting novel frameworks for understanding rumor mechanisms.
With the proliferation of online social networks, rumors can spread rapidly, amplifying public-opinion risks and threatening social stability. To address this issue, we develop a six-state quantum-like rumor propagation model on a static social network by coupling ternary beliefs with binary behaviors. Unlike traditional discrete-state models, the proposed model uses a density operator to characterize individual states and their temporal evolution, allowing multiple belief-behavior tendencies to coexist. Decoherence models coherence loss induced by environmental noise, while a time-dependent multi-channel relaxation mechanism captures late-stage suppression and drives the dynamics from diffusion dominance to inhibition dominance. We further show that the resulting single-node evolution map is completely positive and trace-preserving, ensuring a valid probabilistic interpretation. Simulations show that forwarding-related states rise rapidly in the early stage and then approach a stable regime dominated by disbelief and non-forwarding as decoherence and dissipation increase. At the belief level, neutral groups differentiate quickly and gradually evolve toward disbelief dominance, while belief and neutral states persist as low-level long tails. At the behavioral level, a bimodal forwarding pattern emerges, and later forwarders decay into a long tail. Parameter sensitivity analysis shows that rumor coupling, coherence, and relaxation jointly shape spreading intensity, peak structure, and long-tail behavior. An illustrative comparison with a real rumor sequence and two classical baseline models, namely the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model and the susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) model, further shows that the proposed model can capture early-stage bimodal spreading and middle-to-late-stage long-tail decay in a representative case while offering an interpretable framework for analyzing rumor propagation and suppression mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: