Review discusses nanoparticles’ synthesis and features for cancer imaging and therapy, suggesting potential benefits and limitations.
Radiolabelled nanoparticles are increasingly investigated as multifunctional platforms for cancer imaging, biodistribution tracking, dosimetry, and radionuclide-based therapy. This review focuses on three representative inorganic nanoplatforms: zinc oxide (ZnO), iron oxide-based, and gold (Au) nanoparticles. These systems were selected because they combine distinct physicochemical properties with versatile surface engineering and radiolabelling strategies. ZnO nanoparticles offer pH-responsive behaviour and drug-delivery potential; iron oxide-based nanoparticles provide magnetic functionality, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility, and opportunities for magnetic hyperthermia or local nanobrachytherapy; and Au nanoparticles enable stable surface functionalization, radiometal chelation, radiosensitisation, photothermal effects, and alpha or beta-emitter-based local therapy. The review critically discusses synthesis and surface-modification methods, chelator-mediated and chelator-free radiolabelling, coating-assisted and anchoring-mediated strategies, and the influence of these factors on radiochemical stability, biodistribution, tumour uptake, therapeutic response, toxicity, and clearance. A function-based comparison of the reviewed studies highlights that many systems demonstrate efficient radiolabelling and imaging capability, whereas fewer provide direct in vivo therapeutic efficacy, long-term toxicity, or metabolic clearance data. Overall, radiolabelled ZnO, iron oxide-based, and Au nanoparticles show strong potential for cancer theranostics, tumour-to-organ distribution, therapeutic benefit, and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: