Vertical Bearing Behavior and Capacity Calculation Method of Rock-Socketed Self-Drilling Hollow Bar Micropiles

Self-drilling hollow bar micropiles (HBMPs), which integrate drilling, grouting, and reinforcement into a single process, have broad application prospects in mountainous transmission lines and offshore wind power projects. However, existing research has focused mainly on friction piles in soil layers, and there is a lack of systematic understanding of the load-transfer mechanism and bearing capacity calculation method for rock-socketed HBMPs. Based on field static load tests of rock-socketed HBMPs, this study systematically investigates the vertical bearing behavior and capacity calculation method of single rock-socketed HBMPs through a combination of test data analysis, finite element numerical simulation, and theoretical analysis. The field test results show that the load-settlement curves of rock-socketed HBMPs are of a slowly varying type, exhibiting mixed friction-end-bearing characteristics. After data screening, the average Q-s curve of Pile No. 1 and Pile No. 5 was taken as the benchmark, and the representative ultimate bearing capacity of a single pile determined by the 40 mm settlement criterion is 5860 kN. The test data of Pile No. 3 and Pile No. 4 were retained as independent validation data. A three-dimensional finite element model considering the cohesive contact behavior at the pile–rock/soil interface was established using ABAQUS. After calibration with the test results, the error between the simulated and measured bearing capacity is −3.4%, demonstrating good model reliability. Parametric analysis indicates that the bearing capacity increases linearly with the grouting volume increase rate Vinc, with the expansion effect being the main enhancement mechanism; the improvement amplitude under hard rock conditions is significantly smaller than that in cohesive soils. The effect of uniaxial compressive strength qu of hard rock on bearing capacity is negligible because the capacity is controlled by the pile–rock interface shear strength. The bearing capacity increases approximately linearly with the rock-socketed depth Lr, and a minimum rock-socketed depth of 1.0 m is recommended. Analysis of the load-transfer mechanism shows that rock-socketed HBMPs rely mainly on shaft resistance (accounting for 90.6%), and the axial force decays significantly along the pile length. Elastic compression of the pile accounts for 78% of the pile head settlement, and the limited displacement at the pile tip leads to insufficient mobilization of end bearing. A modified bearing capacity formula considering the grouting expansion effect is established with shaft resistance as the core. A hierarchical validation strategy is adopted to test its predictive ability: for the finite element cases not participating in parameter calibration, the prediction error is within ±2%; for the field test piles, the prediction error is +7.9%; and for Pile No. 3 and Pile No. 4, the errors are +1.7% and −2.1%, respectively. These values are significantly better than those of existing methods (errors ranging from −72.1% to +54.5%). The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the design of single HBMP bearing capacity under rock-socketed conditions.