Crossed molecular beam study reveals effects of butene structure on propargyl radical formation mechanisms.
The propargyl radical (C 3 H 3 ) is the simplest resonance-stabilized free radical (RSFR), but how does stepwise methyl substitution in the alkene reactant affect its dynamics of their formation? We report a crossed molecular beam study of the reactions of atomic carbon (C, 3 P j ) with four butene isomers (C 4 H 8 ) under single-collision conditions at a collision energy of 28 ± 2 kJ mol –1 . Barrierless addition of atomic carbon to the alkene C═C bond triggers ring opening to substituted triplet allenes─a de facto insertion mechanism─followed by unimolecular decomposition via atomic hydrogen (H), methyl (CH 3 ), or ethyl (C 2 H 5 ) loss, yielding a family of propargyl-type RSFRs. RRKM calculations reveal that the branching ratios are highly sensitive to the alkene structure. While the methyl loss channel, affording 1-methylpropargyl, dominates for 2-butenes (80–90%), the predicted hydrogen-atom loss channel (≈10%), leading to 1,3-dimethylpropargyl is identified experimentally by comparison with theoretical energetics. For isobutene, near-equal competition is observed, with the reaction producing 3-methylpropargyl (≈50%) and 1,1-dimethylpropargyl (≈40%), along with 2-vinylallyl (≈5%), whose formation is supported by experimental data. Most notably, the reaction with 1-butene uniquely favors an enthalpically driven hydrogen shift, eventually producing 1-vinylallyl (≈38%), which is assigned based on the excellent agreement between the measured and calculated reaction exothermicity. Rapid entropically favored fragmentation channels yield ≈40% of propargyl-type species (propargyl, 1- and 3-ethylpropargyls), slightly outcompeting the allyl-type product. These results establish a systematic progression from C 2 H 4 via C 3 H 6 to C 4 H 8, where the increasing alkyl substitution unlocks new fragmentation channels, providing a versatile gas-phase route to alkylated RSFRs─key intermediates in the growth of methylated and ethylated PAHs and aliphatic chains in combustion and cold interstellar environments (molecular clouds).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolayev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: