Overview of central clearing benefits and risks in government securities repo markets with implications for policymakers.
Government securities-backed repo markets constitute a key funding source for market participants in many jurisdictions. A number of recent stress episodes, e.g., in US and UK repo markets, has led to renewed efforts to strengthen the resilience of repo markets. This notably includes a push to increased central clearing via central counterparties (CCPs) which may come via market incentives or in the form of mandatory clearing. Central clearing is commonly considered as a key tool to increase transparency and understanding of markets and improve the risk management practices of market participants. This paper provides a brief overview of post trade-arrangements in select government securities repo markets and offers a structured analysis of potential benefits and risks of bringing repo markets onto centrally cleared platforms from a CCP perspective. The paper lists a set of key considerations that CCPs—and indirectly—policy makers could take into account when exploring the expansion of repo clearing services or opting for a repo clearing mandate. Aside from considerations pertaining to access modalities to repo clearing services, default management and market structure-related aspects are of key importance. Together, these factors ensure that the transition of repo transactions from a decentralized, uncleared set-up to central clearing is conducive to more resilient repo and ultimately government bond markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismael Boudiaf (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: