Demonstrates reduced carbon emissions in coal mine energy systems, suggesting improved sustainability measures.
To address the issues of high energy consumption, high carbon emissions, and the waste of associated energy (AE) in coal mine production, which severely hinder global sustainable development goals, this paper proposes a novel low-carbon economic collaborative optimal scheduling model for a coal mine integrated energy system (CMIES) oriented towards sustainable energy transitions. First, a refined utilization model for AE encompassing coal mine gas, ventilation air methane (VAM), and mine groundwater (GW) is constructed, and a tiered carbon emission trading mechanism (TCET) is introduced to constrain carbon emissions and promote ecological sustainability. Second, a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant is integrated to break the rigid “power determined by heat” constraint of a traditional combined heat and power (CHP) unit, thereby enhancing the system’s scheduling flexibility and renewable energy integration. Meanwhile, abandoned mines are retrofitted into solvent storage tanks to construct an integrated flexible carbon capture system (IFCCS), achieving sustainable reuse of mining wastelands. Finally, to tackle the multi-source, heterogeneous uncertainties on both the source and load sides, a hybrid risk assessment method combining information gap decision theory (IGDT) and conditional value at risk (CVaR) is proposed. Case study results demonstrate that, compared to traditional energy supply modes, the proposed model reduces carbon emissions and total costs in the mining area by 66.04% and 15.97%, respectively. This significantly improves resource utilization efficiency and ecological benefits, providing a highly viable pathway for the sustainable development and clean transition of coal mine operations. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid assessment method can effectively assist decision-makers in achieving a refined trade-off between operating costs and system robustness under varying risk preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: