Randomized trial evaluates accuracy and usability of the Shoebox PureTest in clinical trials, suggesting its reliability as an alternative to traditional methods.
At present, traditional audiologic assessments are required to be performed in clinics and present a considerable burden to patients and sites (e.g., cost, time), particularly in clinical trials that require numerous longitudinal visits. This study evaluated an iPad-based remote audiometry technology, the Shoebox PureTest, for accuracy and usability, and aimed to determine whether it is fit for use in research and clinical studies. In participants with a wide range of hearing sensitivity, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer was determined to be sufficiently accurate, reliable, and usable, and was statistically equivalent to gold-standard conventional audiometry assessments at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The user experience survey demonstrated that > 80% of users rated the application and usability as ‘good’, and the overall satisfaction was rated as ‘excellent’ by 92% of participants. Whilst there are operational considerations for future use in clinical trials, the Shoebox PureTest audiometer has been shown to be a valid alternative to conventional hearing assessments which can be used for the optimization of clinical research studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: