Demonstrates efficient building extraction in rural areas, suggesting improved disaster assessment techniques.
To address the issues in traditional earthquake disaster assessment, such as low efficiency, high risk of manual surveys, and limitations of two‐dimensional data, this study selects 16 districts and counties in the Bohai Bay area of Shandong Province (with a total area of 23,635 square kilometers, over 90% of which are rural areas) as the research area. Based on 32,854 high‐resolution images (with a resolution of 0.02–0.046 m) obtained by drones from 2023 to 2024 and on‐site survey data of 8153 buildings, a Mask R‐CNN deep learning model combined with the nDSM is constructed. The data are preprocessed through cloth simulation filter (CSF) filtering and the visible band difference vegetation index (VDVI) to remove vegetation and ground interference, enabling the automatic extraction of building outlines, structural types, heights, and building areas. Rural residences in the research area are mainly of brick‐wood structure (59%) and brick‐concrete structure, with significant regional structural differences. Experiments show that the overall recognition accuracy of the model for building structural types reaches 92.69%, among which the recognition accuracy for brick‐wood structures is 92.05%. The recognition accuracy for 208 buildings is 100%, and the average error rate of building area extraction is only 0.063. This method integrates ArcGIS spatial analysis and Python tools, overcomes the limitations of traditional methods, provides efficient and accurate technical support for preassessment of earthquake losses, seismic reinforcement of rural buildings, and disaster management, and also offers a reference for building information extraction in similar earthquake‐prone areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: