Mechanistic review highlights corrosion challenges in gaseous CO2 pipeline transportation, indicating safety concerns.
With the global advancement of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, the importance of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies has become increasingly prominent. As a critical component of CCUS systems, gaseous CO2 pipeline transportation has emerged as a research hotspot due to its efficiency and cost effectiveness. However, there are invariably corrosion problems when it comes to gaseous CO2 pipeline transportation. These issues pose a significant threat to both the safety and economic viability of pipeline operations. Therefore, it is of importance to investigate gaseous CO2 corrosion during pipeline transportation. In this work, based on recent domestic and international research achievements, research progress in the field of gaseous CO2 corrosion during pipeline transportation is systematically reviewed. First, the corrosion mechanisms and corrosion characteristics during gaseous CO2 pipeline transportation are studied, and the synergistic mechanisms by which key parameters such as impurities, temperature, pressure, flow velocity, and water content jointly influence pipeline wall corrosion behavior are elucidated. Then, corrosion products in CO2 transportation pipelines are analyzed, and protective measures applicable to gaseous CO2 pipeline systems are synthesized. Finally, future research goals are proposed to promote research on gaseous CO2 corrosion during pipeline transportation: the impact of interactions among multiple impurities on corrosion behavior should be clarified; the inhibitory effects of the dynamic evolution of product films on mass transfer processes should be considered in corrosion rate calculation models; and more economical and efficient anti-corrosion technologies should be developed to meet diverse operational requirements. This work can provide guidance for the corrosion protection of gaseous CO2 pipeline transportation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: