Key result
Lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy safely relieves pain while preserving leadless pacemaker function in a case report.
Why the study?
Concerns exist regarding electromagnetic interference during radiofrequency neurotomy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, particularly leadless pacemakers, for which limited procedural guidance is available.
Can lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy be safely performed in a patient with a leadless pacemaker?
Case Report (n=1)
Can lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy be safely performed in a patient with a leadless pacemaker?
Lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy can be safely performed in patients with a leadless pacemaker using a multidisciplinary approach, bipolar lesioning, and continuous monitoring.
RFN may be feasible in leadless pacemaker patients; hypothesis-generating for EMI safety protocols.
Introduction Facet-mediated lumbar pain is commonly treated with radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) following confirmatory medial branch blocks. Because RFN generates electrical current, concerns exist regarding electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, particularly leadless pacemakers, for which limited procedural guidance is available. Case report We present the case of an 81-year-old man with chronic low back pain and a right ventricular leadless pacemaker (Medtronic Micra) who underwent lumbar RFN after successful diagnostic blocks. Pre-procedural electrophysiology evaluation confirmed he was not pacemaker dependent, and the device was interrogated without reprogramming. Bipolar lesioning was performed with continuous cardiac monitoring. The procedure was completed without complication, and post-procedural interrogation demonstrated normal device function. The patient reported significant pain relief at follow-up. Discussion This case highlights that lumbar RFN can be safely performed in patients with a leadless pacemaker when a multidisciplinary approach is utilized. Key considerations include confirmation of device type and pacemaker dependency, pre-procedural interrogation, use of bipolar lesioning to reduce EMI risk, and continuous peri-procedural monitoring. As leadless pacemakers become increasingly prevalent, further research is needed to guide specialty-specific recommendations for interventional pain procedures involving radiofrequency-based therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruzzese et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Chronic low back pain and a right ventricular leadless pacemaker (n=1). Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy was evaluated on Procedural complications and pain relief. Lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy was safely performed without complication in a patient with a leadless pacemaker, resulting in significant pain relief and normal device function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: