Cross-sectional study evaluates plasma fatty acid levels in MSUD patients, indicating DHA deficiency and metabolic changes.
Background Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is an inherited metabolic disorder requiring protein restriction, often limiting intake of animal-derived foods. This raises concerns about long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) status. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate plasma n–3 and n–6 fatty acid levels in MSUD patients. Methods This single-center, cross-sectional study included 16 MSUD patients and 22 unaffected siblings sharing a similar household and environmental background. Dietary intake was recorded and plasma fatty acid profiles were analyzed. Results Dietary assessments revealed significantly lower intakes of total fat and cholesterol (both p < 0.001) and n-3 PUFAs ( p = 0.036) in MSUD patients, with alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) intake as the only individual LC-PUFA significantly reduced ( p = 0.048). Plasma analysis showed significantly lower docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels in patients despite similar dietary DHA intake ( p < 0.001), while arachidonic acid and mead acid were significantly elevated (both p < 0.001). Although plasma DHA concentrations showed a moderate positive correlation with dietary ALA intake (r = 0.516, p = 0.041), regression analysis showed that neither dietary ALA intake (B = 0.005, p = 0.584) nor the dietary n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio (B = −0.552, p = 0.706) independently predicted plasma DHA levels. In the MSUD group, plasma DHA levels were positively associated with dietary leucine intake (r = 0.635, p = 0.008) and plasma isoleucine concentrations (r = 0.524, p = 0.037). Conclusion Our findings provide evidence of DHA deficiency in MSUD patients, which may result from both inadequate dietary intake and changes in n-3 PUFA metabolism, highlighting the need to investigate additional contributing mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zübarioğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: