Scoping review reveals the impact of shared governance on nurses' professional practice, indicating areas for improvement.
BACKGROUND: Shared governance is recognized as an organizational strategy that strengthens nurses' participation in decision-making, supports professional autonomy, and sustains nursing practice in complex care settings. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify, describe, and synthesize the available evidence on shared governance in the context of nurses' professional practice. METHODS: This scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses from database inception to January 31, 2026. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies published between 1994 and 2025 were included. Five categories were identified: (1) organizational structure and governance processes; (2) leadership, empowerment, and accountability; (3) organizational culture, communication, and collaboration; (4) education, training, and competency development; and (5) evaluation, outcomes, and the impact of shared governance. CONCLUSIONS: Shared governance strengthens nurses' professional practice when participatory structures, facilitative leadership, supportive culture, competency development, and evaluation align. This review shows interactions and highlights uneven implementation across settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ventura-Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: