Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares analgesia from two nerve blocks in patients after lumbar spinal surgery, indicating a preference for one intervention.
Purpose Postoperative pain after lumbar microdiscectomy (MD) can be significant. While both the lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) and the posterior quadratus lumborum block (P-QLB) are used for analgesia, they have not been directly compared. We hypothesized that L-ESPB and P-QLB would provide different levels of analgesia after MD. Methods This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial included 60 adult patients (ASA I-II) undergoing unilateral single-level lumbar MD. Patients were randomized to receive a bilateral, postoperative L-ESPB ( n = 30) or P-QLB ( n = 30) with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side. The primary outcome was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at 2 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores over 24 h, rescue analgesia requirements, and adverse events. Results Patients in the L-ESPB group had statistically lower static and dynamic NRS pain scores at all measured time points (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h) compared to the P-QLB group ( p = 0.001). The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia was lower in the L-ESPB group (1 vs. 9 patients, p = 0.012), and the total tramadol consumption was also lower ( p = 0.005). The incidence of nausea and itching was significantly lower in the L-ESPB group. One patient in the L-ESPB group experienced a temporary motor block. Conclusion In patients undergoing lumbar MD, L-ESPB provided superior analgesia and resulted in lower opioid consumption and fewer opioid-related side effects compared to P-QLB over the first 24 postoperative hours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çetinkal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: