Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal analysis reveals the evolution of cybersecurity discourse in China, highlighting governance changes and themes.
China’s official discourse on cybersecurity has undergone significant evolution in response to evolving governance challenges. This study examines how cybersecurity is discursively constructed in China through a longitudinal analysis of authoritative political speeches delivered between 2013 and 2025. These texts are treated here as a systematic corpus that provides access to the recontextualization of security threats, policy rationales, and normative frameworks over time. Integrating Ruth Wodak’s discourse-historical approach (DHA) with corpus-based methods, the analysis proceeds along three dimensions: discourse themes, discursive strategies, and socio-historical context. Findings indicate a stage-based evolution, shifting from confrontational security defense to institutionalized governance, and then to cooperation and coordinated development. Thematic priorities include macro-level governance, public opinion guidance, techno-economic development, and international cooperation. Discursively, a recurrent argumentative pattern of “risk-necessity- responsibility” emerges, serving as a key legitimizing device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: