Randomized trial analyzes incidence and clinical outcomes of aortic arch malformations, implying improved diagnostic protocols are necessary.
Introduction. Aortic arch malformations are rare congenital diseases that often present without any symptoms, making their precise documentation challenging. However, some malformations lead to significant cardiorespiratory effects. This study aims to analyze the incidence, clinical presentations and outcomes of patients diagnosed with aortic arch malformations over twelve months. Materials and method. The study included 70 patients admitted between January 2023 and December 2023 with aortic malformations. Of these, six patients with aortic arch malformations were selected for detailed examination. Data were collected through clinical evaluations, imaging (echocardiography, CT scan), genetic assessments and information about surgical interventions that occurred, focusing on specific types such as double aortic arch, interrupted aortic arch and right aortic arch anomalies. Discussion. The study classified malformations based on known classifications, and analyzed them using multiple diagnostic tools. Comparisons were made with the established literature in order to assess incidence rates and genetic associations, such as the strong correlation between interrupted aortic arch and DiGeorge syndrome. Despite advancements in imaging, rare malformations remain underdocumented due to low incidence rates, impacting statistical significance in prevalence data. Conclusions. This study reported a prevalence of 0.184% for aortic arch malformations in the patient population, consistent with the literature. Aortic arch anomalies often coincide with other cardiac defects, complicating the clinical outcomes. Advances in imaging and early genetic testing play crucial roles in diagnosis and management, enhancing patient prognosis. Prostaglandin E1 and surgical interventions remain essential for managing cases, especially for defects like interrupted aortic arch. Further studies are warranted to better estimate the prevalence and refine the management strategies for these rare congenital anomalies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diaconescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: