Shows an efficient knowledge service system in smart city planning, suggesting improved planning outcomes.
Smart city planning involves a wide range of knowledge domains. However, general intelligent Question Answering systems often fall short when applied to this domain, and the relevant studies are not yet sufficient. To this end, this paper constructs an intelligent QA system that combines a large language model with a domain-specific knowledge graph. Capable of understanding questions accurately and generating professional answers, this system is designed to provide efficient knowledge services for smart city planning by following four steps. First, based on four authoritative planning guidelines, a domain-specific knowledge graph with a four-layer framework is constructed using Neo4j Community Edition 5.26.24. The framework includes top-level goals, knowledge modules, standard terminology and community scenarios. Subsequently, natural language questions are classified and matched with the templates before being converted into structured queries. Finally, the system performs Cypher query language queries and invokes ChatGLM4 to generate professional answers. The knowledge graph contains 100 entity nodes and 44 relations, and its ontology layer defines 28 entity types and 12 relation types. Therefore, the domain knowledge is structured and visualized, and planning professionals can intuitively retrieve diverse planning elements. In addition to its intelligent knowledge query function, this system assists planning professionals in preparing planning schemes and verifying compliance, reducing the time spent on reviewing regulations and comparing clauses, improving the efficiency of scheme preparation, and facilitating the refined implementation of urban renewal projects. It has high application value in smart city planning practices. Its construction approach can also serve as a reference for intelligent knowledge services in other fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: