Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Communities in typhoon-prone regions may underestimate rainfall-driven flood risks from non-landfalling tropical cyclones because they often rely on traditional storm cues such as landfall location and wind intensity. In the Philippines, particularly in the Bicol Region widely regarded as the country’s typhoon landfall belt, repeated exposure to tropical cyclones has shaped local perceptions and behavioral responses toward storm hazards. This study examines flood risk perception, exposure, preparedness behavior, and trust in disaster risk communication, including artificial intelligence (AI)-based weather forecasting, during Tropical Storm Ada (Nokaen), the first tropical cyclone of the 2026 season and a rare early-season, non-landfalling storm. Using survey data from 640 residents in the Partido District of Camarines Sur, the study employed behavioral econometric analysis to analyze factors influencing disaster-related decision-making. Results showed moderate overall risk perception (WM = 3.71) but high preparedness behavior (WM = 4.20). Respondents strongly relied on traditional storm indicators such as landfall and wind intensity (WM = 3.69), contributing to a perception–reality gap (WM = 3.92). Although most respondents reported no flooding, 28.12% experienced localized flooding caused primarily by prolonged rainfall. Regression results revealed that risk perception (β = 0.7734, p < 0.001) and residence in flood-prone areas (β = 0.8534, p < 0.001) significantly increased preparedness behavior, while prior flood experience negatively influenced preparedness (β=−0.5929, p = 0.009), suggesting normalization bias. The study proposes a Behavioral Flood Risk Communication and AI-Integrated Preparedness Framework emphasizing rainfall-centered, impact-based, and behaviorally informed disaster communication integrated with trusted institutional advisories to strengthen preparedness in flood-prone communities.
Emmanuel A. Onsay (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: