Study predicts land-use patterns for 2030, suggesting effective conservation measures.
Land-use scenario simulations support policy decisions that seek to balance economic development with environmental conservation. In Uruguay’s Río de la Plata temperate grasslands, agribusiness expansion has driven land-use intensification, threatening biodiversity, ecosystem services, and rural livelihoods. This study integrates land-use data from 2000 to 2015 with explanatory variables in a multi-layer perceptron Markov model to predict vulnerability to change and land-use patterns for 2030 under three scenarios: business-as-usual, multifunctional land use, and grassland conservation. Under continued intensification, native grasslands are predicted to decline by 9% to a land cover of 51% by 2030, with cropland expansion accounting for 80% of the loss. Reducing cropland expansion and maintaining timber plantations at 2015 levels could preserve grassland cover at 57%, corresponding to more than 10,000 km² compared to the business-as-usual scenario. Except for a northern area with comparatively low conflict potential, approximately two-thirds of Uruguay remain highly susceptible to agricultural conversion. Applying 90 m and 180 m conservation buffers around sensitive areas may reduce agricultural spillover and enhance ecosystem service provision. Implementing 90 m protection buffers substantially curtails cropland expansion within designated areas, resulting in a 139% relative difference in net cropland change compared to the business as usual scenario. By providing high-resolution vulnerability assessments and policy-relevant insights, this study supports evidence-based land-use planning and highlights how targeted conservation measures can help navigate trade-offs between agricultural development and ecological resilience at national and local scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schweikart et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: