Study rates factors affecting audit quality in Fortune 500 firms, suggesting key influences for practice.
This paper describes a study in which Fortune 500 audit-committee chairpersons rated 15 factors according to the items' perceived effect on audit quality. Also elicited were Big Eight CPA-firm partners' views of chairpersons' audit-quality perceptions. Our results indicate that audit-team factors, such as the level of partner/manager attention given to the audit, are perceived by audit-committee chairpersons to have a greater effect on audit quality than such audit-firm factors as the relative significance of total professional fees paid to the audit firm, and that, with only a few exceptions, Big-Eight CPA-firm partners are knowledgeable about such perceptions. The implications of these results for practice and future research are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schroeder et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: