Demonstrates a geometric representation of L-function in elliptic curves, indicating a novel link between arithmetic and analytic properties.
This paper gives an equivalent geometric construction of the L-function of an elliptic curve, in strict duality with the spherical-helix construction of the ζ function. The classical ℘-isomorphism realizes an elliptic curve E as a flat torus (Clifford torus in S³ ⊂ ℝ⁴); analytic continuation, guaranteed by modularity, places L(E,s) inside this geometry, so the complex variable s becomes the coordinate of a point on the toroidal helix. The center of symmetry s=1 of the functional equation (dual to σ=1/2 on the sphere) determines the critical section of the nested tori. Where this section meets the torus, each symmetric pair (Q,R) together with the common apex O forms an isosceles triangle, forced without exception by toroidal symmetry. This triangle carries a threefold identity: metric symmetry |OQ|=|OR| (arithmetic), symmetry s↔2−s about s=1 (analytic, since s is a point on the helix), and group-law balance Q+R+O=0 (the common substrate). Under the equivalent construction the arithmetic and analytic sides are already in bijection, so no bridge between rank and order of vanishing need be built — the isosceles triangle is that bridge. The dimension of the non-degenerate isosceles triangles cut by the s=1 section reads as the Mordell–Weil rank on the geometric side and as ordₛ₌₁ L(E,s) on the analytic side, yielding the rank identity ordₛ₌₁ L(E,s) = rank E(ℚ). The load-bearing point is the equivalent construction itself, resting on the ℘-isomorphism, the Mordell–Weil theorem, the Néron–Tate height, modularity, and the geometric construction of this paper. Bilingual (English and Chinese PDFs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lixin(Dirk) Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: