PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 15, 2026Journal of Information Systems0 citations

An MIS Data Quality Methodology Based on Optimal Error Detection.

View Full Paper
DPDavid B. ParadiceWFWilliam L. Fuerst

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish a quantitative measure of data quality for organizational MIS records.
  • Developed a formulation to classify records as 'correct' or 'erroneous'.
  • Established a benchmark to compare actual and theoretically minimum error rates.
  • Provided guidelines for deriving parameter values from various sources.
  • Introduced a systematic methodology for assessing data quality in organizations.
  • Highlighted the importance of optimal categorization of records for error detection.

Abstract

Abstract As organizational information systems increase in use, cost, complexity, and importance, the quality of the data upon which decisions are based becomes critical. Presently, quantitative measures of an organization's data quality do not exist, with organizations relying on periodic audits of selected applications to evaluate the accuracy of their systems. In this paper, a quantitative measure is developed by formulating the error rate of stored MIS records, whereby MIS records are classified as being either "correct" or "erroneous." This approach has several desirable characteristics including: (1) specification of a bench- mark for comparing the actual error rate with the theoretically smallest attainable error rate, and (2) specification of a method for allocating records to the categories in an optimal manner. Following development of the formulation, a methodology is provided for assessing an organization's data quality. Since quality control methodologies are beneficial only when appropriately applied in the specific organizational setting at hand, guidelines are given for deriving values for the parameters required in the formulation. These values can be obtained from a variety of sources, both mechanized and manual. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relationship between the parameters in the formulation and the verification mechanisms designed to insure data quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paradice et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2f97c8a1cfeec490828c51https://doi.org/10.2308/jis-9701220090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Data Quality as a Strategic Lever for MIS Success: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia's Digital Transformation2024
  2. 2Evaluating Data Quality: Comparative Insights on Standards, Methodologies, and Modern Software Tools2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories2025
  4. 4Digital Design Quality Management: The Theory of Faults2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Data Quality Assessment of information quality dimensions2026