Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical analysis compares equity and efficiency of degressive flat tax with flat and prior systems, indicating implications for tax policy.
The equity and efficiency attributes of degressive flat tax systems are examined and compared with those of the true flat and the pre-1987 tax system. The 1984 National Tax Model was used to empirically estimate the true and two degressive flat tax regimes, and to simulate the Hall-Rabushka degressive system. Among the alternative tax systems, progressiveness and efficiency varied inversely, A degressive model estimated using regression was significantly more progressive than the other alternatives and the 1984 extant system. The tatter regime was associated with the greatest wage efficiency cost. A switch to a degressive system would be associated with a shift in tax burden from lower to upper and especially middle income families.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enis et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: