Randomized trial assesses the impact of policy uncertainty and green finance on sustainable growth in OECD economies, indicating significant beneficial effects and notable challenges.
This study analyzes how policy uncertainty, green finance, green innovation, and the stringency of environmental policy affect sustainable economic growth in OECD member countries from 1996 to 2023. Given the growing evidence that advanced economies are facing structural lock-ins, a lack of coherent policy credibility, and insufficient financial and innovative capabilities, the current study integrates these factors into a coherent empirical framework that continues to prevent disintegration in the current literature. Using environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity as a proxy for green economic growth, the analysis employs a panel of Bayesian econometric models that include linear, heteroskedastic, multilevel, random-effects, and panel vector autoregressive specifications. The techniques support probabilistic inference, explain cross-country heterogeneity, and learn dynamic mono-dependencies between the variables. Findings continually indicate positive, non-negligible influences of green finance, green innovation, and the stringency of environmental policy on sustainable growth, as well as a large negative effect and higher volatility in growth due to policy uncertainty. These multilevel estimates also reveal substantial cross-country variation, with stronger green financial systems mitigating the negative impact of uncertainty. The support for the examination using Bayesian panel vector autoregressions shows that finance, innovation, and policy stringency Granger-cause advances in sustainable growth. However, uncertainty continues to act as an impediment. The long-run relationships are confirmed through robustness checks using the CS-ARDL, AMG, and CCEMG estimators. These findings emphasize the need for predictable policymaking, expanded green finance, strengthened innovation frameworks, and robust environmental laws to promote long-term growth in developed economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qamruzzaman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: