Evaluates model sensitivity to data errors in tax litigation cases, suggesting improvements for accuracy.
A general procedure is described for evaluating the robustness of multivariate empirical tax models to data input error. Our study focuses on 100 Tax Court cases concerning Section 162(a)(2)-location of the "tax home." The sensitivity of several linear discriminant models to random and systematic data error contamination, ranging between three and 30 percent, was tested in 600 Monte Carlo iterations. Robustness was measured with regard to three factors affected by errors: (1) the order in which variables enter the discriminant models, (2) the impact on standardized discriminant coefficients, and (3) the deterioration in model classification accuracy. Implications and extensions for future research are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pollard et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: