Investigates the impact of delisting regulations on firm value in the real estate and industrial sectors, implying significant industry-wide effects.
This paper investigates the intra-industry spillover effects of new delisting regulations in China, with special attention to the unique role of shell value. We find that the new delisting regulation has an intra-industry spillover effect, which indicates it is effective. After the implementation of new delisting regulations, common institutional investors invest based on firm value rather than shell value. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that these spillovers are most pronounced in the real estate and industrial sectors. Among delisting indicators, ‘net profit after excluding non-recurring gains and losses and revenue’ exhibits the strongest spill-in effect, while ‘closing price’ shows the strongest spill-out effect. These findings provide evidence for the efficacy of delisting regulation in emerging countries and offer insights into the peer effect under delisting pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: