Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 1, 1996The Journal of Urology

Post-Prostatectomy incontinence and the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Long-Term Study of Patient Satisfaction and Criteria for Success

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SLScott E. LitwillerUniversity of ViennaKKKap B. KimUniversity of California, DavisPFPatricia D. FoneUniversity of California, San Francisco

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Litwiller et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2fa32039ce68a97d7b161ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65408-9
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Model as 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Mayo Clinic Experience1987 · 69 citations
  2. 2The Effect of Study Methodology on Reported Success Rates of the Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension1995 · 94 citations
  3. 3Patient and Partner Satisfaction with the AMS 700 Penile Prosthesis1992 · 81 citations
  4. 4Post‐prostatectomy incontinence: Part I. The urodynamic findings in 107 Men1992 · 51 citations
  5. 5Mayo Clinic Experience with use of the AMS800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy1989 · 136 citations