Why the study?
Do respiratory measures (RR, petCO2) change in response to mental load during a complex cognitive task in male pilot candidates?
Do respiratory measures (RR, petCO2) change in response to mental load during a complex cognitive task in male pilot candidates?
Respiratory parameters such as respiration rate and end-tidal CO2 are responsive to mental load and may be useful supplements for assessing operator load in pilot selection.
Respiratory changes may aid mental load assessment in pilots; cross-sectional data leave utility unproven pending validation.
While cardiovascular measures have a long tradition of being used to determine operator load, responsiveness of the respiratory system to mental load has rarely been investigated. In this study, we assessed basic and variability measures of respiration rate (RR), partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (petCO2) as well as performance measures in 63 male pilot candidates during completion of a complex cognitive task and subsequent recovery. Mental load was associated with an increase in RR and a decrease in respiratory variability. A significant decrease was also found for petCO2. RR and respiratory variability showed partial and complete effects of recovery, respectively, whereas petCO2 did not return to baseline level. Overall, a good performance was related to a stronger reactivity in RR. Our findings suggest that respiratory parameters would be a useful supplement to common measures for the assessment of mental load in pilot selection. Practitioner Summary: Respiratory measures are a promising yet poorly investigated approach to monitor operator load. For pilot selection, we assessed respiration in response to multitasking in 63 candidates. Task-related changes as well as covariation with performance strongly support the consideration of respiratory parameters when evaluating reactivity to mental load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grassmann et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: