Key result
Contrast dose to creatinine clearance ratio over 3 is linked to ~46% higher CIN risk.
Why the study?
Does restricting contrast volume based on calculated creatinine clearance reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and need for dialysis in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=58,957)
Yes
Does restricting contrast volume based on calculated creatinine clearance reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and need for dialysis in patients undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Restricting contrast volume to less than three times (and preferably twice) the calculated creatinine clearance may reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and need for dialysis in patients undergoing PCI.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between calculated creatinine clearance (CCC)-based contrast dose and renal complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Excess volumes of contrast media are associated with renal complications in patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Because contrast media are excreted by the kidney, we hypothesized that a dose estimation on the basis of CCC would provide a simple strategy to define a safe dose of contrast media. METHODS: We assessed the association between CCC-based contrast dose and the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and need for in-hospital dialysis in 58,957 patients undergoing PCI and enrolled in the BMC2 (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium) registry from 2007 to 2008. Patients receiving dialysis at the time of the procedure were excluded. RESULTS: The risk of CIN and nephropathy requiring dialysis (NRD) was directly associated with increasing contrast volume adjusted for renal function. The risk for CIN and NRD approached significance when the ratio of contrast dose/CCC exceeded 2 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for CIN: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98 to 1.37, adjusted OR for NRD: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.9 to 3.27) and was dramatically elevated in patients exceeding a contrast to CCC ratio of 3 (adjusted OR for CIN: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.66, adjusted OR for NRD: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.94). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the need for minimizing contrast dose in patients with renal dysfunction. A contrast dose on the basis of estimated renal function with a planned contrast volume restricted to less than thrice and preferably twice the CCC might be valuable in reducing the risk of CIN and NRD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurm et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (n=58,957). Contrast dose to calculated creatinine clearance (CCC) ratio > 3 vs. Lower contrast dose to CCC ratio was evaluated on Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.66). A contrast dose to calculated creatinine clearance ratio exceeding 3 was associated with an increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.27-1.66) and need for dialysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: