Key result
South Asian patients had a significantly higher rate of long-term target lesion revascularization compared to White Europeans following PCI (18.4% vs 6.6%; OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.87-4.29; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does South Asian ethnicity compared to White European ethnicity affect the rates of target lesion revascularisation and total mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
1,158 patients admitted for elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention to de novo lesions.
Comparison
South Asian ethnicity (exposure) vs White European ethnicity
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 54 months (IQR 47-65)
Authors
Loading...
South Asian ethnicity was associated with higher TLR post-PCI; leaves open whether ethnicity-specific strategies are warranted pending prospective validation.
Cohort (n=1,158)
Does South Asian ethnicity compared to White European ethnicity affect the rates of target lesion revascularisation and total mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention?
Odds Ratio: 2.83 (95% CI 1.87–4.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 18.4% vs 6.6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
South Asian patients undergoing PCI have a significantly higher risk of target lesion revascularization compared to White Europeans, despite similar long-term mortality.
Toor et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Patients admitted for elective or urgent PCI to de novo lesions (n=1,158). South Asian ethnicity vs. White European ethnicity was evaluated on Target lesion revascularisation (TLR) (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.87-4.29, p=<0.0001). South Asian patients had a significantly higher rate of long-term target lesion revascularization compared to White Europeans following PCI (18.4% vs 6.6%; OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.87-4.29; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: