Key result
The RAMP-HT program significantly increased the odds of achieving target blood pressure compared to usual care at 12 months (OR 1.18; P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does a structured multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme improve blood pressure control, LDL-C levels, and predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients with suboptimal hypertension control?
Cohort (n=10,262)
Yes
Does a structured multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme improve blood pressure control, LDL-C levels, and predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients with suboptimal hypertension control?
Odds Ratio: 1.18
p-value: p=<0.01
A structured multidisciplinary management program for hypertension significantly improves blood pressure control, LDL-C levels, and predicted cardiovascular risk at 12 months compared to usual care.
Supports evaluation of structured programs in hypertension care; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme for patients with hypertension (RAMP-HT) who were managed in public primary care clinics but had suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control in improving BP, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and predicted 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk after 12 months of intervention. METHODS: A total of 10 262 hypertension patients with suboptimal BP despite treatment, aged less than 80 years and without existing CVD were enrolled in RAMP-HT between October 2011 and March 2012 from public general out-patient clinics in Hong Kong. Their clinical outcomes and predicted 10-year CVD risk were compared with a matched cohort of hypertension patients who were receiving usual care in general out-patient clinics without any RAMP-HT intervention by propensity score matching. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to determine the independent effectiveness of RAMP-HT after adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Compared with the usual care group after 12 months, significantly greater proportions of RAMP-HT participants achieved target BP (i.e. BP < 140/90 mmHg) (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and LDL-C levels (i.e. <3.4 mmol/l for patients with CVD risk ≤20% or <2.6 mmol/l for CVD risk >20%) (OR = 1.13, P < 0.01). RAMP-HT participants also had significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk by 0.44% (coefficient = -0.44, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The structured multidisciplinary RAMP-HT was more effective than usual care in achieving target BP, LDL-C and reducing predicted 10-year CVD risk in public primary care patients with suboptimal hypertension control after 12 months of intervention. A long-term follow-up should be conducted to confirm whether the improvement in clinical outcomes can be translated into actual reductions in CVD complications and mortalities and whether such approach is cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=10,262). Risk assessment and management programme for hypertension (RAMP-HT) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Achieving target BP (< 140/90 mmHg) (OR 1.18, p=<0.01). The RAMP-HT program significantly increased the odds of achieving target blood pressure compared to usual care at 12 months (OR 1.18; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: