Key result
A novel sense amplifier design using a Differential Voltage Current Conveyor for a cardiac pacemaker was highly efficient and consumed significantly less energy in 130-nm TSMC simulations.
A novel sense amplifier design using a Differential Voltage Current Conveyor for cardiac pacemakers demonstrates high efficiency and low energy consumption in simulations.
May enable lower-power pacemaker sensing circuits; leaves open clinical validation before any practice change.
This paper presents the implementation of a sense amplifier for a low-power cardiac pacemaker using the Differential Voltage Current Conveyor (DVCC). Two significant aspects of the pacemaker are sensing and pacing. The pulse generator, which is the heart of the pacemaker, consists of a sense amplifier, a logic unit and a timing control unit. The sense amplifier comprises an instrumentation amplifier, a bandpass filter and a comparator that are used to detect the QRS complex wave from the cardiac signal. Based on the output of a sense amplifier, the logic unit and the timing control unit decide whether to pace the heart or not, which achieves the requirement of the demand pacing. In this paper, a novel design of the sense amplifier using a DVCC is proposed, and the simulations are performed using 130-nm TSMC technology. Furthermore, the modes of the pacemaker VVI, DDD and rate-responsive algorithms have been implemented using the structural approach in VHDL by taking into consideration the timing cycles of a pacemaker. The design analysis shows that the proposed model of pacemaker is highly efficient and consumes significantly less energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bikki et al. (2022) studied this question. Sense amplifier using Differential Voltage Current Conveyor (DVCC) was evaluated. A novel sense amplifier design using a Differential Voltage Current Conveyor for a cardiac pacemaker was highly efficient and consumed significantly less energy in 130-nm TSMC simulations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: