Key result
Virtual reality simulator training is linked to ~57% higher end-of-year OSATS scores versus traditional apprenticeship.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the skill acquisition, operative competency, and confidence of vascular surgery residents during a limb angioplasty workshop, and to evaluate their surgical volume and retention rate over a year.
Does virtual reality simulator training improve skill acquisition and confidence in lower limb angioplasty among vascular surgery residents compared to an apprenticeship model?
Cohort (n=17)
No
Does virtual reality simulator training improve skill acquisition and confidence in lower limb angioplasty among vascular surgery residents compared to an apprenticeship model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A virtual reality simulator workshop significantly improves vascular surgery residents' skills and confidence in lower limb angioplasty compared to standard apprenticeship training.
ObjectiveTo assess the skill acquisition, operative competency and confidence of vascular surgery residents during a limb angioplasty workshop and to evaluate their surgical volume and retention rate over a year.MethodsFor three years (2018–2020), all residents/fellows in their final year of vascular residency at a school hospital were enrolled. Five residents in 2018 were enrolled in the Control group (apprenticeship model). Twelve residents/fellows from 2019 (Training group) and 2020 (COVID group) were trained with the ANGIO Mentor in two workshops. Residents were evaluated using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), simulator metrics, and a confidence questionnaire. A p-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe groups were similar regarding age, sex, and number of limb angioplasties performed (Control 25.00±5.52; Training 23.16±7.44; COVID 24.50±8.17, p=.91, Student’s t-test). The residents of the Training and COVID groups showed significantly improved OSATS scores with the first workshop (15.50 [interquartile range 12.62–19.13] to 37.00 [36.50–39.38], p=.01 and 14.50 [13.62–15.00] to 34.75 [30.75–38.75], p<.001, respectively) and reported confidence improvement (from a median 3 [3–3] to 4 [4–5], p=.01). After six months, the retention rate was good; during that semester, each resident performed 10.50 [7.00–13.25] limb angioplasties. The second workshop neither improved the residents’ scores nor their confidence. At the end of the year, residents from the Control group scored worse than those from the Training and Control groups (Control 23.50 [19.00–24.50], Training 37.0 [36.50–39.37], COVID 34.75 [30.75–38.75], p=.005, Kruskal–Wallis test). The simulation metrics did not show significant differences among groups.ConclusionA three-week limb angioplasty workshop can improve residents’ skills and confidence. Performing 10 angioplasties per semester is sufficient to ensure the retention rate is good after six months, and a second workshop is unnecessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Vascular surgery residency training (n=17). Virtual reality simulator training (ANGIO Mentor) vs. Apprenticeship model (Control group) was evaluated on Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores at the end of the year (p=0.005). Virtual reality simulator training improved end-of-year OSATS scores compared to the traditional apprenticeship model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: