Key result
Each minute of shock delay is linked to ~6% higher risk of failing to terminate VF.
Why the study?
Does a longer delay to first shock reduce the probability of successful first-shock ventricular fibrillation termination and survival in patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Cohort
Does a longer delay to first shock reduce the probability of successful first-shock ventricular fibrillation termination and survival in patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Every minute of delay to first shock in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with initial VF is associated with a significantly lower probability of VF termination and survival to discharge, reinforcing the need for rapid defibrillation.
BACKGROUND: In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who present with an initial shockable rhythm, a longer delay to the first shock decreases the probability of survival, often attributed to cerebral damage. The mechanisms of this decreased survival have not yet been elucidated. Estimating the probability of successful defibrillation and other factors in relation to the time to first shock may guide prehospital care systems to implement policies that improve patient survival by decreasing time to first shock. METHODS: Patients with a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation (VF) as an initial rhythm were included using the prospective ARREST registry (Amsterdam Resuscitation Studies). Patient and resuscitation data, including time-synchronized automated external defibrillator and manual defibrillator data, were analyzed to determine VF termination at 5 seconds after the first shock. Delay to first shock was defined as the time from initial emergency call until the first shock by any defibrillator. Outcomes were the proportion of VF termination, return of organized rhythm, and survival to discharge, all in relation to the delay to first shock. A Poisson regression model with robust standard errors was used to estimate the association between delay to first shock and outcomes. Every additional minute in VF from emergency call was associated with 6% higher probability of failure to terminate VF (adjusted relative risk, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]), 4% lower probability of return of organized rhythm (adjusted relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98]), and 6% lower probability of surviving to discharge (adjusted relative risk, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.95]). CONCLUSIONS: Every minute of delay to first shock was associated with a significantly lower proportion of VF termination and return of organized rhythm. This may explain the worse outcomes in patients with a long delay to defibrillation. Reducing the time interval from emergency call to first shock to ≤6 minutes could be considered a key performance indicator of the chain of survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stieglis et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation. Delay to first shock vs. Shorter delay to first shock was evaluated on Failure to terminate VF (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.07, p=<0.001). Every additional minute of delay to first shock was associated with a 6% higher probability of failure to terminate VF (RR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07) and a 6% lower probability of survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: