Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bernard Williams claims that we should feel “agent-regret” for bad events we cause but for which we are not blameworthy. Such agent-regret involves no presupposition of fault, yet it also involves a need to personally make amends. This combination suggests that agent-regret, even if virtuous, is inherently irrational. In this paper, I defend agent-regret from attempts to explain it away as a confusion of other attitudes. I argue that the rationality of agent-regret is found in how it makes sense as a response to conflicts that might arise between people through nothing more than bad luck.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Sussman (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: