Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Efforts to minimise inequity in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) are well-researched. This is frequently explained by differences related to singular factors. The concept of intersectionality recognises that the combination of variables exacerbates disparities. OBJECTIVE: To identify and review what is known about intersectionality's impact on experiences of PEoLC, including advance care planning (ACP). METHODS: A rapid review with a narrative summary of peer-reviewed articles. Six electronic databases were searched for studies explicitly exploring the role of intersectionality in the experience of PEoLC and ACP for people with life-limiting or terminal illnesses, published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: Identifying eligible papers was challenging. Of the 3738 papers found, only seven were eligible. Of the seven included papers, four explored the impact of intersectionality on access to and attitudes towards ACP. Two studies involved access to PEoLC and one considered quality of care received in the last year of life. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding intersectionality is crucial for delivering personalised approaches to care and support. The relationship between intersecting factors and end-of-life experiences is complex and there is currently a paucity of studies considering this. The majority of existing literature addresses a narrow range of variables. Additionally, the lack of guidance on the application of intersectionality in research, makes it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. Further diverse action-orientated research is necessary to produce impactful evidence to inform future policy with the aim of reducing inequity in PEoLC.
Hudson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.