Randomized trial evaluates soil moisture estimation in forests, suggesting machine learning can improve accuracy.
This study evaluates the potential of L-band passive microwave data for monitoring soil moisture (SM) in boreal and temperate forests using SMAP and SMOS AM and PM overpasses. SMAP and SMOS Level 3 SM products were first assessed for spring and summer seasons. SMOS showed lower accuracy (r2 = 0.04–0.24, ubRMSE = 0.09–0.13 m3/m3), while SMAP performed better (r2 = 0.18–0.62, ubRMSE = 0.05–0.07 m3/m3) across sites and overpasses. Given the larger number of SMAP TB observations at a fixed incidence angle and greater temporal coverage over the study area, SMAP was selected for SM estimation using ML models. Feature importance analysis identified brightness temperature (TB) as the most influential variable, followed by vegetation water content (VWC), air and soil temperatures, and the microwave polarization difference index (MPDI). Soil and air temperatures were interchangeable during AM overpasses, whereas PM overpasses showed distinct differences, likely due to thermal absorption by dense vegetation. Using optimal features, SM was estimated with CatBoost, Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Principal Component Regression (PCR), using stratified shuffle split (SSS) and leave-one-year-out cross-validation (LOYOCV). In SSS, CatBoost achieved slightly higher accuracy than the other ensemble models (AM: r2 = 0.73; PM: R2 = 0.74), while PCR yielded substantially lower accuracy across both overpasses. LOYOCV showed closer rankings among models, with CatBoost ranking highest overall (r2 = 0.58 for AM and 0.54 for PM). Results highlight the feasibility of improved SM estimation in forests using L-band TB, VWC, temperature variables, and MPDI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esmaeilisarteshnizi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: