Examines how cyclic water-sediment supply modifies stratigraphic temporal resolution, suggesting implications for environmental change understanding.
Fluvio-deltaic deposits archive environmental change, but internal depositional dynamics can modify or erase signals before preservation. Whether a signal survives the stratigraphic filter depends in part on its duration: signals with periods shorter than the time required for a system to smooth its own uneven topography tend to be lost, whereas longer-period signals are more readily preserved. This smoothing timescale, or compensation timescale ( T c ), is well constrained under steady conditions, but how it responds to external forcing remains unclear. Here we combine physical and numerical experiments spanning a range of forcing amplitudes and periods in input sediment-to-water discharge ratio, using a sediment mass-extraction framework to define dynamically equivalent measurement positions across experiments. We show that cyclic forcing increases T c by as much as fourfold relative to unforced controls. Under fast forcing, intermediate amplitudes produce the longest T c , whereas weak and strong forcing amplitudes yield values within 30% of the control. Under slow forcing, T c increases more monotonically with amplitude, reaching two- to threefold above control at the highest amplitudes tested. Basin-scale topographic roughness, rather than local channel depth, is the strongest predictor of T c across both forcing regimes ( r = 0.81–0.89, p < 0.001). These results show that forcing itself modifies the temporal resolution of the stratigraphic archive, so the stratigraphic record is not a passive filter with a fixed cutoff; instead, its temporal resolution coevolves with the amplitude and period of the forcing it records.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: