Cross-sectional study investigates student-athlete preferences for trainer and physician demographics, indicating key implications.
OBJECTIVE: Investigate student-athlete (SA) preference for gender identity, race, and ethnicity of their athletic trainers (ATs) and team physicians and understand reasons for these preferences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) SAs. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: SAs gender, race, and ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SA preference for gender, race, and ethnicity of ATs and team physicians. RESULTSATOTALOF: 212 NCAA SAs completed the study. Those of minority gender (female), ethnicity (Hispanic), and race (non-white) were more likely to prefer ATs with concordant characteristics and this was significant for gender (odds ratio [OR] for ATs 8.81; OR for team physicians 4.41; both P < 0.01) and race (OR for ATs 12.25; OR for team physicians 10.22; both P ≤ 0.01) but not statistically significant for ethnicity (OR for ATs and team physicians 4.25; both P = 0.9). SAs cited the importance of professional competence, comfort during physical treatment, and empathy and relatability as reasons for their preferences. CONCLUSION: NCAA SAs who identify as female or non-white race significantly prefer ATs and team physicians with concordant demographic characteristics. Understanding these preferences when building medical teams may help SAs feel safe and valued by their medical providers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schroeder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: