Develops an evaluation index system in design education, suggesting enhanced interdisciplinary integration.
Urban Digital-Intelligent Development drives Chinese Capital Cultural Resources integration into design education, yet assessment tools are scarce. This study developed an evaluation index system via a five-round Delphi method with experts, establishing 4 primary and 17 secondary indicators. Full questionnaire recovery and high consensus (mean score≥4.2, CV<0.3) validate the system. It offers a practical support to deepen interdisciplinary integration, supporting cultural innovation, and design education reform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yonghua et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: