Randomized trial assesses CFRP retrofit effects on collapse safety of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames, indicating improved stability.
Non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with unconfined joints dominate the collapse hazard of the existing building stock. Their CFRP-retrofit margin at collapse demand is poorly quantified. Two one-third-scale portal sub-frames were tested under Froude similitude. Specimen 1 was bare. Specimen 2 carried a three-ply hoop CFRP jacket on columns, beams, and joints. Both received the Antakya 3141 record from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Mw 7.7 mainshock at design intensity 0.35 g and collapse intensity 1.0 g. Cyclic response was decomposed into flexural, shear, and slip energy. At design intensity, the retrofit cut peak roof drift by 54%, suppressed residual offset, and lowered the calibrated Park–Ang index from 0.89 to 0.32. Slip share dropped from 47% to 5%. At collapse intensity, the retrofitted frame transitioned to joint-panel debonding-controlled failure at 8% drift with 245 mm residual, and shear share rose to 64%. The dominant-half-cycle ratio R1 ≈ 0.72 emerged as a candidate brittle-damage signature for collapse-level response. A Lam–Teng confinement check confirms that the failure migrates from the column ends to debonding fracture in the wrapped panel rather than being eliminated by the retrofit. Supplementary joint-corner anchorage is recommended for non-ductile joints at collapse demand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oyguç et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: