Simulation study quantifies dynamic responses of tunnel linings under blasting loads, highlighting safety risks.
Strong seismic waves induced by drill-and-blast tunnel excavation threaten the structural integrity of adjacent existing tunnels; however, prevailing safety evaluation methods mostly simplify tunnel linings as homogeneous continua, failing to accurately characterize the meso-scale uncoordinated dynamic response between rebar and concrete under blast impact. To fill this research gap, a 1:1 full-scale separated three-dimensional finite element model of reinforced concrete composite linings was established using the LS-DYNA explicit dynamic numerical algorithm, which was verified by previous 1:25 scaled physical model tests. This study systematically quantifies the spatiotemporal evolution of lining dynamic responses under two core parameters—tunnel clear distance (10 m to 60 m) and single-delay detonating charge quantity (10.8 kg to 28.8 kg)—to validate the response differences between materials. It is abstracted that the structural failure is dominated by axial tensile stress, with the embedded rebar being significantly more sensitive to internal stress surges (reaching 3.5 times the peak stress of concrete), while the concrete is more sensitive to particle vibration velocity amplification, a mismatch that is particularly acute within a 30 m clear distance. This study highlights the severe interfacial stress gradient between rebar and concrete, providing an indirect but critical indicator for the potential risk of interface debonding under adjacent blasting, and offers a quantitative theoretical basis for extending safety assessments from macro-surface vibration control to refined meso-scale internal stress monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: