Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved patient access and flow in a health system, suggesting benefits for other systems.
Patient access and hospital flow remain among the most pressing challenges for health systems today. Emergency department boarding,1 prolonged inpatient stays and delayed speciality appointments create inefficiencies, increase costs and undermine patient experience. Inova Health, a nonprofit system in Northern Virginia, undertook a system-wide transformation to address these challenges by moving from a site-based to a system-based approach. This paper outlines the guiding principles, infrastructure and cultural shifts that enabled Inova to create an integrated ‘access and flow system’. Key enablers included the development of a centralised capacity management team, a system transfer centre, a multispeciality contact centre and digital tools such as self-scheduling, remote monitoring and automated outreach. Organisational change management, including standardisation of processes and a consumer-first mindset, was central to success. The paper discusses the lessons learned in shifting from a holding company model to a true system of care, highlighting the importance of technology enablement, transparency and resilience in leading large-scale change. This experience demonstrates that patient access and flow are not isolated challenges, but system challenges requiring coordinated solutions. The implications for other health systems are clear: meaningful progress requires infrastructure, cultural alignment and leadership commitment. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks .com/business/.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: