Shows improved railcar distribution efficiency in heavy-haul railways, suggesting better operational management.
In heavy-haul railway systems, effective empty railcar distribution (ERD) can optimize composition planning and meet empty railcar requirements (ERRs) at all loading ends, thereby improving the efficiency of train operations. To solve practical challenges such as the imbalanced supply–demand of empty trains, redundant loading and unloading cycles, and prolonged waiting times, this study establishes a multi-objective and 0-1 integer programming model for ERD at the loading end of a heavy-haul railway. The model can simultaneously maximize the fulfilment of all ERRs, minimize the ERD delay time, and reduce the waiting time in the heavy-train combination problem under complex constraints, including the passing capacity of sections, combination capacity of stations, and ERR at the loading end. While traditional optimization methods such as mathematical programming or heuristic algorithms partially address these issues, they are ineffective under dynamic constraints and state-space explosion. Furthermore, traditional reinforcement learning-based methods, such as Q-learning, exhibit limitations in railway scheduling due to the state-space explosion problem and inadequate model generalization. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an innovative framework; the ERD at the loading end of the heavy-haul railway is formalized as a Markov decision process and optimized using deep Q-network (DQN) reinforcement learning. In addition, this study proposes an experience data fusion mechanism that integrates the empirical rules of the dispatchers through a modular architecture, achieving real-time constraint compliance while maintaining scalability for practical implementation. The NSGA-II genetic algorithm for multi-objective problems is used in this study to evaluate the performance of the DQN algorithm. The experimental results demonstrate that the DQN algorithm can fully meet ERRs with zero delay and produce optimal schemes for train combinations. Meanwhile, NSGA-II presents superior performance in minimizing the combination waiting time and same-destination train combinations. Meanwhile, the DQN algorithm can identify superior ERD strategies in the expanded-action and state spaces, enabling the effective handling of complex constraint-based ERD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: