Single-center study assesses predictors of difficult-to-manage axial spondyloarthritis, highlighting the importance of functional impairment.
Background: Predicting difficult-to-manage (D2M) axSpA remains challenging, as both inflammatory and non-inflammatory factors contribute to treatment failure. Functional impairment captured by Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) may provide additional predictive value, but are rarely evaluated in this context. Objectives: To assess the predictive value of HAQ-DI and MDHAQ for identifying patients at risk of D2M axSpA in real-world clinical practice. Design: Single-center retrospective observational study based on data from a clinical registry. Methods: The study included patients with axSpA initiating biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Data included demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters, as well as patient-reported outcomes. D2M status was defined according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. Health status was evaluated using HAQ-DI and MDHAQ. Logistic regression identified predictors of D2M status at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks. Results: The cohort included 300 treatment courses in 217 patients (average age 45 years, 49% female, 83% HLA-B27 positive, 83% r-axSpA). At baseline, 11% patients met ASAS criteria for D2M axSpA, decreasing to 8.8% at week 48. D2M patients were older ( p = 0.03), exercised less frequently ( p = 0.04) and had higher disease activity. In multivariable models, baseline HAQ-DI independently predicted D2M status at baseline (OR 3.29, p = 0.008) and week 24 (OR 4.56, p = 0.005) and functional dimension of MDHAQ at week 24 (OR 3.47, p = 0.039). Conclusion: Functional impairment, reflected by higher HAQ-DI and MDHAQ scores, was the strongest predictor of D2M axSpA and may serve as a valuable tool for identifying these patients early and addressing nonpharmacological management strategies ahead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guła et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: