Key result
Higher Lp(a) is linked to progressive LDL-C overestimation by conventional assays, especially above 30 mg/dL.
Why the study?
Does high Lp(a) concentration affect the accuracy of BQ-based LDL-C measurements compared to GP-HPLC?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,560)
Does high Lp(a) concentration affect the accuracy of BQ-based LDL-C measurements compared to GP-HPLC?
Effect estimate: r = 0.302 and 0.321
p-value: p=<0.001
High Lp(a) concentrations cause a concentration-dependent overestimation of beta-quantification-based LDL-C and underestimation of VLDL-C due to altered lipoprotein density.
BACKGROUND: Most conventional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) assays are standardized by the CDC reference procedure of beta-quantification (BQ) method, which involves density-based ultracentrifugation to separate very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL. Apolipoprotein (apo) (a) covalently binds to apoB, altering lipoprotein density thereby affecting this separation. We evaluated the impact of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on LDL-C assay accuracy. METHODS: The distribution of apo(a) between VLDL and LDL was examined by ultracentrifugation and gel permeation high performance liquid chromatography (GP-HPLC) analysis in three subjects. LDL-C values were compared between the conventional assays calculated by Sampson's formula (S-LDL-C) and direct homogeneous assay (D-LDL-C) and the GP-HPLC analysis (GP-LDL-C) for 1560 human samples, and the influence of Lp(a) concentration was analyzed. RESULTS: Apo(a) was detected in the LDL fraction by ultracentrifugation and in both VLDL and LDL fractions by HPLC. Strong correlations were observed between S-LDL-C, D-LDL-C and GP-LDL-C, but significant differences existed among the methods (P < 0.001). The differences between S-LDL-C or D-LDL-C and GP-LDL-C positively correlated with Lp(a) (r = 0.302 and 0.321, respectively, P < 0.001). When Lp(a) exceeded 30 mg/dL, these differences were significantly larger (n = 139). The difference between S-LDL-C and D-LDL-C was not significantly correlated with Lp(a) (P = 0.774). Conversely, VLDL-C measured by Sampson's method showed a negative correlation with Lp(a) (r = -0.262, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Apo(a) increases VLDL density, causing it to be recovered in the LDL fraction during density-based separation. Consequently, Lp(a) causes concentration-dependent overestimation of BQ-based LDL-C, and underestimation of VLDL-C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamazaki et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in LDL-C assay accuracy (n=1,560). Lipoprotein(a) concentration was evaluated on Difference between conventional LDL-C assays (Sampson's formula and direct homogeneous assay) and GP-HPLC analysis (r = 0.302 and 0.321, p=<0.001). Higher lipoprotein(a) concentrations positively correlated with the overestimation of LDL-C by conventional assays compared to GP-HPLC (r=0.302 and 0.321, P<0.001), especially when Lp(a) >30 mg/dL.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: